Forgotten Kingdoms Forums

Posted: **Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:54 pm**

Since there are now NE druids around, could be possible playing a NG druid of Mielikki or Chauntea?

Posted: **Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:46 am**

Yes, I think that nothing would prevent you from doing so.

Posted: **Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:16 am**

Since most druids of Chauntea and Mielikkie are neutral good (true neutral being mostly Silvanus druids), could old druids of Mielikkie and Chauntea apply for an alignment change?

Just curious,
Thanks,

Posted: **Sun Apr 08, 2007 9:10 am**

They sure can.

Anybody can apply for an alignment change.

Posted: **Sun Apr 08, 2007 6:42 pm**

Only Druids of Mielikki are allowed NG. However, Chauntean clerics(not druids) are mostly NG, so I guess it works out both ways as there is no split for the Cleric/Druid class in FK.

Posted: **Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:11 am**

Rhytania wrote:Only Druids of Mielikki are allowed NG. However, Chauntean clerics(not druids) are mostly NG, so I guess it works out both ways as there is no split for the Cleric/Druid class in FK.

Ahh yes, thats what I meant... I think, heh.

Was a bit of a silly question anyways. Sorry!

Posted: **Sun Jul 08, 2007 12:14 pm**

I think the help file for 'Druid' needs be updated, if this is the case.

"Only an elf, half-elf, forest gnome, centaur, ghostwise halfling, wemic,
earth genasi or human priest of True Neutral Alignment may become a druid."

Posted: **Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:21 pm**

Emrys wrote:I think the help file for 'Druid' needs be updated, if this is the case.

"Only an elf, half-elf, forest gnome, centaur, ghostwise halfling, wemic,
earth genasi or human priest of True Neutral Alignment may become a druid."

Thanks Emrys! It has now been set to read

Only an elf, half-elf, forest gnome, centaur, ghostwise halfling, wemic, earth genasi or human priest of non-lawful, non-chaotic (i.e. neutral) alignment may become a druid.

Can someone in the know confirm that this is correct?

Posted: **Mon Jul 30, 2007 5:13 am**

You might want to be just a little more specific, so that there's no misconception, as I would seriously doubt the presence of NG Malarites or NE Meilikkans or Chaunteans.

Posted: **Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:49 pm**

Ok, I think I now have it all cleared up! To summarize what I now understand to be the case:

1) All "priests" of Malar, Chauntea, and Mielikki are actually druids
2) ONLY "priests" of Malar, Chauntea, and Mielikki can be druids, save by special application
3) Druids can be true neutral, or NG for Chauntea and Mielikki, NE for Malar

Helpfiles for the dieties in question, druids, and priests have been modified to reflect the above!

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:36 am**

Druids can be true neutral, or NG for Chauntea and Mielikki, NE for Malar

It depends. For 2 and 3ed ALL Druids had to be TN, the only ones that where allowed to deviate where druids of Mielikki and Druids of Malar. Those where the only two. Now recently in 3.5 they made it that any druid can be any alignment as long as it is a base nuetral. So I guess it depends on how far the admins want to meld into 3.5.

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:29 pm**

Rhytania wrote:For 2 and 3ed ALL Druids had to be TN, ... So I guess it depends on how far the admins want to meld into 3.5.

Actually, a bit wrong here Rhy. 3.0 rules allowed druids of any neutral alignment. 2.0 were the ones that only allowed TN. So just clarifying that the rule about druid's neutrality didnt change in 3.5, it actually changed in 3.0

Just so everyone knows, I am completely against NE druids of Malar. I mean... cmon guys, be realistic?